Originally Posted by
neville_nobody
The problem was that the governments were unwilling to actually enforce their own laws and thereby screwing all the law abiding taxi licence owners. They did the right thing and followed the law yet Uber came in illegally and screwed them all because the government wouldn't prosecute. Which then begs the question what is the point of regulation if you are not willing to uphold it?
Was is it the case, the government wouldn't prosecute or that the regulator's legislation was ineffective? And does that also apply to the aviation regulator?