FD,
As I recall (EASA land) reverse is not considered at destination in dispatch calculations. However, … wait for it … operational requirements may change due to the application of ‘TALPA’ performance as required by Certification Specification CS-25 Amendment 27 (change info, retrospective application, at page 14 onwards -(
https://www.easa.europa.eu/downloads/134260/en).
This suggests that dispatch to a contaminated runway can use reverse where approved by new calculations for contaminated surfaces. Additionally to a wet runway classified as ‘Slippery Wet’ (code 3) n.b. previously / same as Slippery When Wet as in NOTAMs. Note potential confusion with with Boeing / FAA terminology involving slippery runways.
FAA position uncertain; new ‘TALPA’ contaminated performance data should be applied ( as 25.1592/92 ), but a get out of … via AC 25-32
Landing Performance Data for Time-of-Arrival Landing Performance Assessments (para 11)
https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/...r/AC_25-32.pdf
EASA briefing (at time of arrival):-
https://www.easa.europa.eu/downloads/125411/en
Other relatively new references:-
ICAO Circular 355 Assessment, Measurement and Reporting of Runway Surface Conditions
pilot relevant info throughout the document
https://www.icao.int/WACAF/Documents...55_cons_en.pdf
ICAO Doc 10064 - Aeroplane Performance Manual ( Feb 2020 ?)
again, pilot relevance throughout
https://www.sapoe.org/wp-content/upl...rce.pdf#page60