Originally Posted by
Flaming galah
+1 what LB says. The decisions you cite as authority in support of your action just aren’t relevant. Keep it simple.
Hi FG, and thx LB. i can work on that tmrw. good practice anyways.
in the meantime, in short, imho CASA is ignoring their duty aka misfeasance.
when i did the online AAT application and paid $900, i was asked to do an additional form to clarify the decision etc. perhaps i can try attaching that pdf form here, else i can at least copy the key para.
note the most promising thing was that when the AAT wrote back with the hearing date - it was
the AAT who called it: “jurisdiction question”. which i take to mean, does CASA have the jurisdiction to ignore my P149 for no reason… 🧐