Pudniks and CASA [2021/5950]

[skinduptruk]

Originally Posted by Lead Balloon

And here's an AAT decision from June this year in which the AAT affirmed CASA's decision that the applicant was not a fit and proper person: Schott and Civil Aviation Safety Authority.

thx for that link. id missed that one. apparently he was faking the IFR quals of 32x other pilots and could not justify his actions. ouch. he kept his main flying licence (freedom of movement) tho.

to compare: i was subject to an unlawful ban (to my freedom of movement) which i disputed. SAFA wrote "there is no defence to your actions". CASA ignored that glaring (natural justice aka procedural fairness) issue, then used my dispute in turn as an excuse to ignore their duty re P149 for over 1 year and counting.

anyways, it'll be quite interesting to see how the AAT treats my case.