Hi LB, pls read Repacholi case law (link above).
CASA held an anon VHS tape they tried to use as evidence of his sins. he won. because the evidence showed nothing “unsafe” and showed CASA didnt have a clue about that specific plane operation to boot.
link below is a case where AAT said the Gov (ASQA) was unfair in its “fit and proper” test.
Trades College Australia Pty Ltd and Australian Skills Quality Authority [2020] AATA 812 (16 April 2020)
btw the High Court only costs $4,000 and one can represent oneself.
i do realise ur applying the “black hat” worst case analysis. but there may be hope yet 🤠
may i suggest, pls read these AAT links in full (Repacholi + ASQA so far, with the Qantas + CASA failure on FRMS up next).
imho the AAT has more power and more common sense than you seem to suggest. thx for your thoughtful replies tho! 🙏🏻