Originally Posted by
Dominator2
I am at a loss as to why it is recommended to fit a Stall Warning System when an Angle of Attack Indicator with Audio Warning would achieve so much more?
Is it just that the Coroner was not adequately briefed to enable her to fully understand the problem?
The Service Inquiry recommended 'AOC 22 Group investigate the incorporation of an artificial stall warning capability'. (para 1.4.253)
From the Coroner's remarks, and her written decision, it would seem she was displeased that the same recommendation had been made after an incident in 2007, with nothing done. She is not trying to dictate a solution, but repeating her point that known risks are not tolerable and ALARP, and that this constitutes negligence (but not gross negligence).
Some would say negligence is negligence.