Originally Posted by
Exrigger
The comment quoted from the coroner explains why the MOD avoided a corporate manslaughter charge again, in isolation that is probably correct, but add all the other failures of duty of care in the not to distant past there must be a case to take some more serious action against the MOD as they do seem to avoid actually doing anything to prevent incidences repeating themselves.
Is a Coroner not allowed to consider previous offences? Is the reason because this evidence wasn't given to the Coroner in court? I read that the family didn't have a lawyer.