So how did he manage to work out where we landed and at what time? On both those flights? (I’ll have to take your word for it on the call sign, too long ago now to remember).
Originally Posted by
MickG0105
There is limited ADS-B data for that flight that shows that of the seven position indicators that there's good data for none of his fixes came within 30 km of the target aircraft's position with the error growing to nearly 70 km toward the end of the first two hours. The smallest error recorded exceeded his sampling rate of 2 minutes; that's not good.
That was the point of the flights. There was limited ADSB data available and in parts of them we did NOT follow published air routes.
Given that one of them over flew Sydney, how did he know we didn’t land there?
Any thoughts on the blind test of the RNZAF P3 flight? Details of that aren’t on ADSB or flight tracking websites either and yet the tracking is pretty bloody close to what they flew.
I get being sceptical but this appears to have some legs.