Originally Posted by
tucumseh
Now I suggest you go and read the risk register, risk RED/OTHR-I/05, relating to command eject. You'll have seen this if you've read the XX177 report in full.
I wonder what maintainer's think about the risk being mitigated from 'pilot and pax suffer major injuries' to 'worst credible outcome becomes major injuries to pax only'. End of. No further mitigation. Tolerable and ALARP. By any interpretation, my post comes nowhere near this.
What about 'changing command eject rationale'?
You aren’t understanding this are you. I understand fully how the command eject system works on Hawk. It’s the pejorative language you’ve used which doesn’t fit what you’re trying to say.