Originally Posted by
Foghorn Leghorn
somehow infers that he was seen as disposable and he was just collateral. I guess if you were to say that to the pilot’s face he would be less than impressed. I’ve read the SI thank you.
Now I suggest you go and read the risk register, risk RED/OTHR-I/05, relating to command eject. You'll have seen this if you've read the XX177 report in full.
I wonder what maintainer's think about the risk being mitigated from 'pilot and pax suffer major injuries' to 'worst credible outcome becomes major injuries to pax only'. End of. No further mitigation. Tolerable and ALARP. By any interpretation, my post comes nowhere near this.
What about 'changing command eject rationale'?