Originally Posted by
Lead Balloon
You're responding to arguments I haven't made.
Best for you to now focus on confirming compliance with your superannuation guarantee obligations in relation to the people you've described as casual employees.
Good luck with it all.
I did, it's compliant, but thanks for pointing that out, I wasn't sure. I wasn't in any way critising you I hope you didn't see it that way. I support most of your arguments by the way.