Originally Posted by
Peter_L
Again, you have no idea what you're talking about. You're all so angry about the fact that there's potential treatments out there for the virus, and there's strong cognitive dissonance clearly around the topic amongst those of you that believe that the leaky vaccines are a silver bullet.
Studies have shown that disease interventions that aim to prevent symptoms without preventing transmission can have dangerous evolutionary consequences and need to be considered in cases with imperfect vaccines. Leaky vaccines are a known dilemma in the scientific community.
The same with Ivermectin. Just because you select one discredited study and a seemingly biased news article written by a journalist (not a doctor) that holds it up as central proof that Ivermectin doesn't work doesn't make it so. Studies remain ongoing.
No need for all the childish ad-hominem attacks when you yourselves don't even know what you're talking about.
Still waiting for those "Dozens of studies"- can't find 'em, eh?