OK, I'll play your silly game (but if you want me to correct your grammar and spelling, it will cost extra
)
So if I don't have clue about that of which I speak, and Iraq under Saddam
was involved in WMD or terrorism - the former charge being, of course, relevant to the current conflict - then where, precisely, is the slightest shred of supporting evidence to back up these claims?
Perhaps such evidence requires to remain secret, for reasons which cannot be explained to the uninitiated; if so, then just say so, and I'll happily accept it.
Or maybe there isn't any, because it was all fibs from the start. Now whose thesis was it that they plagiarised the "dossier" from?
I'm more than happy to accept gospel from those who may be wiser than me, but I'm a slow learner, and I need a few pictures and diagrams to help me understand. So where is the proof that Iraq under Saddam had WMD and supported terrorism?
Waiting eagerly.
PS: I still think that taking him down was a good thing.