Originally Posted by
Lead Balloon
I'm always chuffed when you duck the substance of my posts, Mick.
I could probably say the same. For the sake of clarity and the avoidance of doubt, what was the substance of your post? I thought that it was, at least in part, trying to demonstrate that my contention regarding efficacy end points was wrong. I addressed that quite specifically.
Originally Posted by
Lead Balloon
So, the UNSW School of Population is definitely incompetent.
Seriously? You're going to run that nonsense line? That credits neither of us.
Originally Posted by
Lead Balloon
How does that change the validity of my conclusion about the "perception" of "safety" of the Pfizer v AZ?
So, was
that the substance of your post? That's a long way from arguing that we bought into AstraZeneca based on costs or that in January we knew that Pfizer was 'the better vaccine'.
You'll get no arguments from me that thanks to a variety of factors, not the least of whom being the future Governor of Queensland, AstraZeneca has been pretty well trashed in the court of public opinion.