PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - The New rules interpretation thread.
View Single Post
Old 18th June 2021 | 09:41
  #48 (permalink)  
Buttscratcher
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 369
Likes: 99
From: Mostly here, sometimes over there...
Originally Posted by BuzzBox
As I said in a previous comment: "121.535 provides for relief of the PIC, but it doesn’'t explain how an FO or SO without an ATPL can be left in charge."

Hopefully, common sense would prevail, but I'm not sure such a thing exists in CASA's world of 'strict liability'.
I think your Company Docs, such as the FAM, will provide the 'relief' you require
Buttscratcher is offline  
Reply