Originally Posted by
rich34glider
So if a wing fell off your aircraft and you had a Mk.1 parachute available (that had been tested with a 99.9% rate of success) you wouldn't use it because .. see above. Interesting!
So am I correct in understanding your argument here? A wing falling off = 100% chance of death. So the experimental parachute would be used even if its safety data showed it as being 0.1 % successful as you have no other options.
Not really a sensible comparison with mattyj. We have a virus that is 0.01% chance of severe symptoms and a vaccine with similar chance of severe side effects, and you think its not sensible to sit back a wait to see a little more data? When did having another opinion to you become so offensive?