Originally Posted by
Xeptu
An aircraft is missing believed to be lost at sea. (circumstantial evidence)
A witness observed an aircraft fitting that description impact the sea. (compelling evidence)
A recovery vehicle has located and has video footage of the aircraft in question on the ocean floor (proof)
give it a bloody rest,
can’t refute any points made, so deflect…
we all know what circumstantial evidence is. And it most certainly IS admissible. So you seem to have drifted off your original statement..
and some of us can see exactly where lots of circumstantial evidence points. And I mean LOTS of evidence. If you choose to refuse to believe that another pilot can commit mass murder, apart from German wings then fine.live in delusion
on the balance of strong possibility there is only one conclusion.. ,