Originally Posted by
Xeptu
So you just happened to find the body and your DNA is on it and the victim is known to you, so you must have committed the murder. Do you see the problem with circumstantial evidence.
no.
You are just blindly holding out that anything, ANYthing, ANYTHING apart from one of you, a pilot committed mass murder. It is desperation.
I have given you motive.
I have given you opportunity.
I have given you the more than coincidental timing.
I have given you the flight on the simulator, done only six weeks prior.
his wife had moved out only weeks before.
‘His wife had moved out, and was living in the family’s second house.’
“By his own admission to friends, he spent a lot of time pacing empty rooms waiting for the days between flights to go by”.
your scenario is more like,
your DNA was found on the victim
your mobile phone was pinging towers in the vicinity of the crime at the time of the murder. And the crime was committed at a place you would never usually go to.
the victim was shot with the same caliber gun that you own
when the police ask for your gun to match ballistics, it has mysteriously disappeared, must have been stolen
the victim owed you a million dollars which they were refusing to pay.
But it wasn’t you. Honestly. And to suggest otherwise is just some completely unfounded conspiracy theory.