Geoff, interesting you say that (paralysis by analysis). Id argue that is exactly what we have now. OAR are paralysed because they don’t actually have the skills or knowledge to make a determination of the best way forward. It’s not entirely their fault, because their management structure also won’t back them if they make a controversial decision.
So we end up with solutions looking for problems in the hope that the airspace it is applied to remains "fit for purpose" , then they can report that they have "done something"
Take the latest solution iteration for Ballina....the broadcast zone is to be 15nm. It makes the situation worse!! How long do we sit back and let the OAR wave the magic wand? Do we need to wait for them to kill someone? Or is that going to be ok because the latest airspace arse pluck (err I mean "risk assessment") declared it to be "fit for purpose"
Why dont we develop the tools to help the OAR do their job? Or get rid of the OAR......
Alpha
Oh and plus everything Lead Balloon posted