PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Voices of Reason and Class E
View Single Post
Old 20th Apr 2021, 03:57
  #83 (permalink)  
Gentle_flyer
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Geoff,

Chance ? I agree, I used the word Providence in a post on the incident several weeks ago.

Are you sure the relevant aircraft were not on radar?

I seem to remember a post of yours in regard to Ballina re the non display of SSR tracks due track duplication with ADSB tracks on the CAGRO’s “air situation display”.

Perhaps I misunderstood. If I did I was not the only PPRUNE reader who took it that way? If I misunderstood what were you referring to?

AsA’s published radar coverage dictates I at least ask the question...The facts should have been in the ATSB report.

Given your accusation that AsA is using a airborne based safety net in lieu of ATC based procedures (surveillance or procedural methods), ( an accusation I have sympathy for by the way and not just in G airspace) could you simply explain to me (and other readers)in a sequential list of processes how E airspace NAS version would have prevented this incident from occurring.

I think it would be very educational.

Don’t worry I wont ask you to do the same for MNG but others might...

Thanks in advance!

Gentle_flyer

Last edited by Gentle_flyer; 20th Apr 2021 at 04:10.
Gentle_flyer is offline