[QUOTE=Lookleft;11024883]But it wasnt a runaway stabiliser, It was a system that Boeing had not identified to operators and minimised its impact on operations to the regulator. If a sim session included multiple alerts, the check captain playing the part of an intrusive ATC and involved a system that the crew were not aware of then no, the crew would not be failed, as the session would involve a scenario above and beyond what a line crew would reasonably be expected to cope with.
In case you skipped this post have a read then explain what part of manfacturer negligence and moral bankruptcy you don't understand:[/QUOTE
Do you think if the crew in the Lion Air accident had known about MCAS it would have made a difference to the outcome. I very much doubt it.
The F/O couldn’t find the Unreliable Airspeed Non Normal in the QRH, mean while the aircraft has the stabiliser trim wheel spinning and the aircraft getting out of trim and the crew never noticed it, come on.
Unfortunately in this was accident going somewhere to happen.
I have said my piece I’m off to put another 737Max back into operation.