PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Mooney accident pilot refused a clearance at 6,500'
Old 6th Apr 2021, 23:53
  #315 (permalink)  
Lead Balloon
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Australia/India
Posts: 5,293
Received 422 Likes on 210 Posts
Originally Posted by CaptainMidnight
My recollection is that this directive was issued to Airservices a couple of hours prior to the commencement of the caretaker period prior to an election. I also recall that after the election Airservices referred the issue to CASA, to assess and advise if SSR was really required for all Class C airspace where established that did not have coverage.

CASA's response in due course was no, not required. I assume the minister was advised accordingly and decided not to pursue the matter.

There is probably a thread on here, would have been early 2000's.

Edit: found this (one of these should work, depending if you are logged in or not):

PPRuNe Archives: Class C radar direction
PPRuNe Archives plain text: Class C radar direction
That's about right.

The Direction was issued as the usual pre-election Dick-distractor.

CASA's opinion on the matter was irrelevant to Airservices' obligation to comply with the Direction, but great raw material for the usual smoke and mirror tricks.
Lead Balloon is online now