Originally Posted by
Scattercat
I'd add further, that from a human factors perspective, we build a much better picture (situational awareness) from what we see directly with our eyes, as opposed to what and how we interpret images or information on a screen. Hence, even in these poor visibility conditions, viewed through NVG's they would have received and processed a much clearer and quicker picture of their situation. Low level, low visibility flying requires the use of all available inputs from Mk 1 eyeballs, navigation instruments, radar & of course, other crewmembers.
I'm not entirely convinced by that argument Scattercat. You best derive Situational Awareness from your most effective inputs at that time. It could be naked eye, or it might be the sensor that's currently working best for you (or a blended solution). All this has to be underpinned by good CRM and appropriate procedures otherwise you are permanently on the back foot.