“250KTS in E” - “30 mile ish terminal area E over D”
- I can no longer apply speed control as effectively as was the case with C!
Pre - 27 Nov!
At 50nm+ I could apply “wide” speed differentials to achieve comfortable unrestricted and EASY simultaneous procedural descent clearances into the circuit area between conflicting IFR/IFR/VFR transitioning from C to D.
AusNAS is absolutely RETROGRADE! FACT!
Hey “
Smaket”?……..... PNR is it?
How’s the membership numbers?
Bothered polling them on AusNAS?
Who proudly agreed to have the AOPA insignia on the AusNAS glossy?
Has AusNAS re-invigorated GA?
Any positives for your membership out of AusNAS?
Anyone else wonder what else “Indiana” has over “Dark Helmet” and “John O’Buttheysaid”?
Must be more than just election handshakes for them to stick with this “Dead Cat”!
2B1ASKDICK
people like you make me sick at least VFR pilots are trying to help and improve
Care to elaborate?
You w#ankers think you so perfect and experts in aviation it makes me vomit.
……….. being Commercial Pilots and Air Traffic Controllers and in large numbers?!?
And to what do you aspire?
Of course you have never forgotten to switch on your transponder or cycle it back over to alt have you, dickh##d.
The point exactly, ye’ ground sheet!
Before “Dickspace” transponders were not critical as a “first line of defence” in “procedural C”! FACT!
I guess “SmithOPA” and the “Bureau de Gobblers” will consider it just a union beat up!
Perhaps you or your mate “Smaket” might attempt to explain how AusNAS makes our airspace:-
- Safer
- More conducive to expeditious flow of air traffic
- More cost effective
Just answers to these questions please!