Originally Posted by
Una Due Tfc
Okay so if we’re talking semantics, the pressure vessel was left intact (that we know of), but the fuselage was still penetrated.
It worries when people are so determined to downplay, generalize. Safet first? Clearly an uncontained engine failure that could have hit the cabin too.
A quick search showed there were Pratt 777 blade seperations in 2018 and 2020 also. So Japanese authorities pulled the plug and then FAA and Boeing.
Would love to see Boeing/FAA take innitiatives to ensure safety after incidents, instead of denial and only look bold when things became inevitable.