PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - That does not seem expensive for a puma
Thread: That does not seem expensive for a puma
View Single Post
Old 11th Feb 2021, 08:43
  #8 (permalink)  
BTC8183
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: South
Age: 62
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Same aircraft in 1997/98, when G-Checked in Aberdeen[credit unknown, but i suspect a member of this forum] 'Short 332's are still desirable with external load 'specialists' for basic weight benefits, but i suspect the low price of this example reflects its current certification status or lack of.
BTC8183 is offline  
Reply