PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - WA: Push on or Pull Out?
View Single Post
Old 8th Feb 2021, 21:53
  #12 (permalink)  
Mach E Avelli
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: All at sea
Posts: 2,198
Received 168 Likes on 106 Posts
Originally Posted by wheels_down
Seems to be ongoing investigations from the regulator out in the West in regards to PIC decision making around diverting to the nearest suitable, or continuing on to destination/engineering base. The opinions on this out there also seems divided in terms of landing at whatever is closest vs flying on for an hour.

Air Asia 237, Air Asia 221, and most recently Virgin 1788. Not sure if Network 2658 is another.

The ATSB usually does not push the blame on any crew as such, however they clearly did not approve of the decision making in last weeks release of Virgin 1778.
The armchair experts at the ATSB should butt out on this one.
It is apparent from the report that the PIC was well aware of the risks, possible mitigations and how best to manage workload during an abnormal event. The crew displayed good CRM and the PIC had (rare) empathy for the health of the remaining engine.

Consider that by the time they identified and dealt with the problem, completed all checklists, attempted a relight and re-secured the dud engine they would have been about a third of the way to destination. It is only a 200nm sector. It would not be usual to start a turn-back or diversion until all the abnormal procedures had been completed. You'd look like a goose if the relight had been successful (now where should we go?), and any diversion from the planned track is workload best avoided until priority activites are completed.
With a situation nicely under control, turning back to an uncontrolled airport with a less easy 2D approach and fewer emergency facilities versus a straight-in 3D approach to an international airport and two other military aerodromes close to on-track is a no-brainer.
As for the ATSB comments about OEI climb speeds and maximum OEI altitude; really this is nit-picking. If weather, terrain or range are not limiting, the pilot should be free to select whatever provides adequate performance. Lower and faster is often safer than nibbling at the limits of the envelope.

Well done that crew, I say.

Last edited by Mach E Avelli; 8th Feb 2021 at 22:06. Reason: typo
Mach E Avelli is offline