Ignoring the fact that this story is in the "Daily Right Wing Nutter" I am greatly amused by the pearl clutching and swooning of MPs at the concept that you might actually go to a conflict zone to "...protect human security and in cases of war to dampen down violence rather than intervene on one side or the other".
Gosh, what a terrible idea that we might actually go somewhere to calm things the fu*k down, instead of seeing it as a solution to all our munition expiry dates. If your Government lobbyists include people whose future depends on war and conflict, you can be sure this idea is appalling to them. We already have seen actions where "police, engineers, aid workers, or health workers" have been a key part of the mission, but the "Daily Agitated Loon" instead spews the vitriol about the focus being on "gender balanced and ethnically diverse" as if we have asked a gang of Pedo's to run an orphanage.
The Defence Industry is wholly dependent on us not learning from history and never daring to try a different approach. Plus Daily Fail readers of course...