Austrian Simon
On the contrary, simply pointing out that it wouldn't be the first time you have mis-categorised an engine failure as "uncontained".
You are a great journalist, Simon, when it comes to reporting facts, so I'd suggest that you content yourself with that, until such time as you can report on the findings of the investigation.
If you're determined to subject the incident to "analysis" in the meantime, you might want to reflect on the fact that the media coverage shows the engine from pretty well every angle.
If a blade, or part of one, was ejected radially, it appears to have managed to do so without making any discernable hole in the nacelle. The statement that you quote from the JTSB doesn't support your assertion that it was an uncontained failure.