Originally Posted by
falcon900
Er, no, it doesnt. There is nothing faintly sinister, unexplained , or covered up about the Nimrod crash, and hence it has no relevance to DVs ongoing campaign. It is rather self serving of Dv to use its anniversary as a catalyst to bang his drum. Again.
Ironically, I dont disagree with the general point he is making, but dredging up this particular accident and implying that there is something to be learned or uncovered by a FAI is in my view quite wrong and distasteful.
very, very well said Falcon. A lot of good has been achieved by some very tenacious people on here. Unfortunately, I feel that DV has picked the wrong accident to try and pin his campaign to here. Then compounded by Chug jumping on the passing bandwagon and just getting it oh so wrong.