PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - VC-32 Replacement
View Single Post
Old 16th Nov 2020, 20:47
  #10 (permalink)  
tdracer
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,418
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by Less Hair
Wouldn't some 767 tanker with passenger or VIP cabin make the most sense?
As I've mentioned on the KC-46 thread, there are numerous bumps and bulges and other changes on the KC-46 that have no apparent relationship to the aerial refueling missions (I won't elaborate for what should be obvious reasons). So I have little doubt the KC-46 already has provisions for additional roles.
So yes, the KC-46 would make a good starting point.
tdracer is online now