POST 1233- A precednt? AAT Finding aginst CASA
An attachment that may not be a particularly interesting read to many, but it is pertinent.
This is a previous AAT finding by a gentleman that had his business, position, and reputation allegedly destroyed. In this case, CASA unsuccessfully played the "safety card."
I claim the same against CASA, and importantly, they have no "safety card" to play.
Its only a question of "intent".
Last edited by glenb; 14th Sep 2020 at 02:26.