I have some difficulty with this posting of yours, GtE, notwithstanding my great respect for the many insightful and wise comments you have offered on these pages. If the LAA announced conducting a review, could you not rather enlighten us on the outcome, several years later? Or, if there's none, after all these years, that might be saying something, too.
As it stands, I cannot but read your citation as a questioning of the type's intrinsic safety, though of course you carefully avoided stating so. Yet, as I read it, the cited accident report mainly questions pilot training and currency. Nothing to do with the Rans design, which I will keep supporting and advocating.