Originally Posted by
Training Risky
No. Not good. Vague politically-driven social engineering, interfering with scientific anthropometric methodology enabling REAL engineering! How much time and money will be spent tinkering with a tried and tested measurement regime for the benefit of a tiny minority of statistical outliers?
According the original post 44% of women are excluded on anthro grounds. Please explain how nearly a quarter of the working population is "a tiny minority of statistical outliers"?