Originally Posted by
Lead Balloon
You're assuming that the sources, contents and volumes of airflow to which each of the POB were exposed were exactly the same. Blind Freddie wouldn't make that assumption.
Is your insurer getting nervous, Wingnuts?
‘Insurer nervous?’ Not sure what you are assuming here. A more relevant question would be, ‘How do you account then for the CO in the blood samples?’ After all, that’s the report’s smoking gun and the basis of the CO assertion you are welded to.