I was referring to your propensity to convict/condemn without factual evidence.
that's because you assume I don't have any evidence for the Chiv aircraft. The picture of the wirestrike aircraft asks far more questions, as does the removal of their min height on CADs for the legs.
However, as I said, the SI will exonerate the crew if there is nothing to criticise so why get so out of shape about a fat old crab taking an interest?