PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Future Carrier (Including Costs)
View Single Post
Old 17th Jul 2020, 11:09
  #5954 (permalink)  
SLXOwft
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 1,279
Received 132 Likes on 86 Posts
Apologies for the lack of aviation content in the following lengthy response.

Kiwi, there has been "media speculation" which ASC Shipbuilding / BAE Systems Australia have denied. Some of the reaction is that "they doth protest too much", I am not so sure.

There have been a number of articles in Australian Financial Review e.g.
https://www.afr.com/politics/federal...0200713-p55bi4

Frigates added to Defence watch list of troubled watch list of troubled projects
The navy's $45 billion future frigate project has been added to a Defence Department watch list because of emerging concerns over its design.The frigate's inclusion as a Project of Interest comes as the principal engineer overseeing the design work quit the department, with sources attributing it to frustration.
Source: Australian Financial Review 14JUL2020
https://www.defenceconnect.com.au/ma...class-concerns

BAE sets the record straight on Hunter Class concerns
It seems as though the Royal Australian Navy’s big-ticket acquisition projects can’t seem to catch a break with concerns about the $35 billion SEA 5000 Hunter Class frigate program now coming to the surface, however, how accurate are the concerns?

When the Commonwealth announced in June 2018, it would be partnering with BAE Systems Australia as the successful tender for the $35 billion SEA 5000 Future Frigate program, it seemed as if the pieces were finally falling into place for the government's signature $95 billion naval shipbuilding plan.

Despite the well documented challenges facing the Future Submarine Program, the Hunter Class appears to have be progressing well, at least until now, with Andrew Tillet of The Australian Financial Review reporting on a series of concerns stemming from within industry and Defence in an article titled 'Sinking feeling: Frigate heads back to drawing board'.

In this piece, Tillet quoting the Department of Defence confirmed that the dimensions of the Hunter Class frigates have grown as part of the design phase in order to accommodate Australian specific requirements, ranging from radars and computers, through to the American-designed Aegis combat system.

Tillet stated, "BAE Systems conceded the frigate may have to swell in size but insisted it would still meet the Navy's requirements.
"The Australian Financial Review understands senior naval officers are beginning to have misgivings, although the relationship is nowhere near as strained as it is with the French submarine designer Naval Group."Tillet added, "The initial design, as pitched to the government, gave the frigate a weight of 8800 tonnes when fully loaded and length of 149.9 metres.

"The winning bid deviated from the base UK design because it was required to include the Australian developed CEA phased array radar, the American Aegis combat system and an Australian developed combat tactical interface by SAAB."

This recognition appears to make a mountain out of a molehill, at a time when concerns about the value for money proposition presented by major defence acquisition program is increasingly in the spotlight.

Adding to his concerns, Tillet quoted an 'industry source', who said: "One industry source said the frigate's weight was on track to exceed 10,000 tonnes, necessitating the need for the hull to become bigger, which could affect its speed, acoustic performance and ability to conduct stealthy anti-submarine warfare operations.

"A larger vessel has several flow-on costs, including construction, needing extra fuel for sailing and the provision of wharf infrastructure."

Craig Lockhart, managing director of BAE subsidiary ASC Shipbuilding, countered the concerns raised by both Tillet and the unnamed industry source, telling Defence Connect, "ASC Shipbuilding is currently going through the normal naval design process for the Hunter Class frigate and is working collaboratively with the Capability Acquisition and Sustainment Group and the Royal Australian Navy to design a ship that meets Australia’s capability and performance requirements.

"This design work involves understanding the impact of the Australian-specific systems and equipment, and incorporating the agreed design activities which have occurred as the first of class Type 26 Global Combat Ship design matures. Contrary to the suggestion made in the article (AFR 26 June 2020), Hunter is not being redesigned, but instead our team is right in the middle of a normal naval ship design process for Hunter."
Source: Defence Connect 26JUN2020
Similar article on Janes.com - but you need to be a subscriber to see it all (which I am not)
https://www.janes.com/defence-news/n...class-frigates
SLXOwft is offline