Does anyone not see the Kafkaesque absurdity in this action? The airfield is marked with a U for unverified. Well and good. However the absence of an ERSA entry leaves me with no contact information if I want to find out more. Furthermore, I would have thought the basic information of lat and lon, plus elevation, plus a few other details is/was/ accurate unless an earthquake has intervened. Even an entry explaining what WAS there would be useful.
Its bizzare, “there is an airstrip here, but we won’t tell you anything about it, nor how to find out more”. This is a safety hazard. In the absence of data pilots might not use them when they should. Furthermore, gossip and second hand information will replace ERSA an ERSA entry. This is a hazard.