Originally Posted by
down3gr33ns
Discrimination for or against those currently not getting any support? Surely a good judgement call is to support those who need it but are not getting it.
I did allude that there may be those who missed out or that, maybe some funds needed to be used for stimulus etc.
You apparently reckon that money that doesn't exist (has to be borrowed) BUT was predicated on expected requirements in tough times, appears now only half the expected will be required.
BUT you still want to go out and have a big night at the pub and just put it on the credit card?
Q: yes or no, do you believe the earmarked (initial $130BN) money in any way, or at any time, has to be repaid?
Yes or No....it's not rocket science.
Cheers