Thanks FD; its good to hear that some aircraft systems are being used with matching certification and operational approval. Also, that common sense is not yet flattened by 'training for the sake of training'.
What was the other aircraft type.
Uplink, 'off the runway'; a highly improbable scenario given system integrity requirements, and instrument displays and alerts, e.g. LOC deviation.
Operational thinking from 'the early days' has evolved with increasing experience and knowledge. Low DHs relating to visual cues became 'confirm a runway', which was more for the pilots peace of mind than operational practicability.
Also changes in procedure with more knowledge of realistic minimum visibilities, 50-70m RVR could be 00 met vis; personal experience lowest was 90-110m RVR (ATC / fire rescue may limit operations to 50/75 m)
GA from the runway might be muddled operational regulatory thinking about a mixed integrity auto-land and rollout systems; fail-op land, fail-passive rollout.
Not a lot of common sense in some operational regulation.
dh, wiggy; ok.
Why not look outside and enjoy the view; there is a lot to see, and many differences day/night, different runway surfaces/lighting.
LOC deviation on the runway - unlikely; yet in VMC practice it was quite a surprise when ATC switched runways and ILS while ground-roll was still engaged. (I think that LOC display remained centred, but the aircraft didn't).