Originally Posted by
Slasher1
Not if the intent was to evade the contractural terms by so doing (i.e. closing a base to evade furloughing in order of seniority mandated by an existing contract would almost certainly generate a claim and a quagmire--kind of like skipping town to avoid paying a bill). Yes; right of return on an expensive contract.
Just playing devils advocate here but, why wouldn’t they get them back on an expensive contract if the intent is to make people redundant?
After they are back in HKG you offer the new and improved COS to everybody and from there you proceed with redundancies.
Getting back to HKG permanently on expat terms sounds exceedingly implausible to me. We will all see in the end, just seems to me this is about to get very ugly and very “unfair”, so to speak.