PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - The F-35 thread, Mk II
View Single Post
Old 6th Mar 2020, 10:33
  #8 (permalink)  
beardy
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: UK
Age: 69
Posts: 1,407
Received 40 Likes on 22 Posts
Originally Posted by ShyTorque
No, because the aircraft is in a constant descent. However, as the IAS decreases and aerodynamic lift reduces, power will be increased to compensate.

Another factor is that in a fully vertical descent, the engine may ingest hot air from its own exhaust and possibly dirt. Neither are good.
Why no?
Constant descent is a red herring, if it is constant there is no acceleration so vertical lift vector = weight. Vertical lift vector is the sum of vertical thrust vector and vertical lift vector. As you say as speed decreases lift from wing decreases and engine thrust must compensate although the airframe drag will decrease which will require less engines thrust to overcome and may compensate. Unless the Rod in the approach is sufficient for landing then that too must be slowed by a further increase in thrust.
It is all speculation on my part, the truth is out there!
beardy is offline