PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Is Bell testing a multi-fenestron?
View Single Post
Old 20th February 2020 | 00:59
  #9 (permalink)  
FH1100 Pilot
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 803
Likes: 52
From: Pensacola, Florida
Originally Posted by jimjim1
As mindsweeper alluded to if they are electric many of these objections turn into advantages.

Much fewer parts, especially moving parts, and possible redundant operation. Losing a singe motor is not necessarily a catastrophe. I have no idea how the number might work out for such a drive system but it doesn't seem completely ridiculous anymore. If it were possible to get rid of variable pitch blades then such a system would be even more attractive, however that may be straying into the ridiculous
From the Vertical Magazine article...
“In a nutshell, we removed all of the conventional mechanical anti-torque components — which is gearboxes, driveshafts and tail rotor hub and blades — and replaced it with four electric motors and fans,” Eric Sinusas, program director of light aircraft at Bell, told Vertical. “They are fixed-pitch blades and they’re changing rpm constantly.”
FH1100 Pilot is offline  
Reply