Isn’t it a violation of employment ordinance to not provide the working roster for the next month on the 15th of the current month?
Now for those that sign the “blank check” form, fair enough, you’ve given them full consent to have their way with you. But for those of us that haven’t, could we not legally tack on those missing notification days in front of the March roster? Another lawsuit to add to the pile?
Word on the street is that those consenting have signed off critical redundancy protections in their contract, making them less complicated to put on furlough than someone who hasn’t.