Originally Posted by
jonkster
I had not seen this until just now.
They have defined incipient spin (something that has been not stated in CASA docs before
AFAIK)
As the MOS requires students to demonstrate proficiency in recovery from incipient spin, this seems to me to then imply that RPL/PPL training will require training (for that phase) in an aircraft that is (legally) spinnable.
Am I interpreting that correctly or am I missing something?
If so that will be interesting for schools who don't have access to such aircraft for that phase of the student's training.
I am also curious, will RPCs require this as well?
(NB Comments on this draft advisory close 27 January - 3 days from this post)
i think you are missing this
”
Draft AC 61-16 v1.0will also provide guidance for an upcoming proposed amendment to the Part 61 MOS, to change the practice of advanced stall training. This proposed amendment would remove the requirement for recovery of spins at the incipient stage, in favour of avoiding spins by training recovery from wing drop at the stall, making it consistent with spin avoidance and stall recovery training principles used in International Civil Aviation Organization upset prevention and recovery training (UPRT).”