PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Boeing, and FAA oversight
View Single Post
Old 10th Jan 2020, 13:32
  #22 (permalink)  
MechEngr
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 864
Received 214 Likes on 118 Posts
Originally Posted by Loose rivets
But WHY?! Just what drove him to say that? Re the 1-11. We had a week's differences course just between two very similar marks. The MAX possibly didn't need a full type rating course, but 90 on an iPad? What was in the minds of people that though that was a good idea?

It just keeps coming.
Unless something specific to an AoA sensor failure leading to a crash was being specifically discussed as a training item, MCAS-specific training is unlikely to have made any difference to the accident flights. There was no difference in concept for the behavior of trim runaway and no inkling about the potential adverse effect of MCAS on trim.

That seems to be the only significant difference to the handling of the plane and, if it wasn't discovered or appropriately evaluated before shipping the planes to customers, it would never be added to training.
MechEngr is offline