PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - What Boeing range SHOULD look like?
View Single Post
Old 7th Jan 2020, 14:06
  #4 (permalink)  
clipstone1
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Luton
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ATSA1
Flyfan...a good post, i can't disagree too much with your points...

Could a 737 replacement be shrunk/stetched to meet the 737/757 market and would it be sufficiently more efficient than an A220 or A319/A320/A321 to be viable?

The 787 takes care of the 250+ pax market

The 777X fills out the top end of the long haul market pretty well, and the end of the A380 programme shows that anything bigger isnt needed..

But strapping lots of go faster/more efficient goodies onto a 1960s airframe is no longer an option!
The 787 is a great long haul aircraft, but too heavy and thus inefficient to fill the old B757 (180-220 seats) and B767 (250-290 seat) short to mid haul routes, hence the fact Boeing bothered to launch the B737-10. So the replacment for the B737 needs the ability to a) carry the pax and b) have a suitable range, by way of relatively easy stretch similar to the A318/319/320/321/XLR.

clipstone1 is offline