PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Future Carrier (Including Costs)
View Single Post
Old 28th Dec 2019, 21:41
  #5819 (permalink)  
Auxtank
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Uka Duka
Posts: 1,003
Received 37 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by hulahoop7
There is no point having Type45s, Astutes if they aren’t facilitating hard power. The UK either has a blue water navy, or resigns it’s seat at the security council and reverts to local and constabulary roles. But be prepared for what that reduced position will bring.

We are finally at the cusp of having real / credible kinetic threat and influence (although more USS America than Nimitz) but in true British style we will throw it all away.. plus the billions already spent because of foggy thinking and lack of political will.

I would go as far as to say that without the carriers the deterrent should also go, as its retention without a credible conventional threat is a dangerous and fundamentally exploitable position.
Agreed. You can have as many little ships as you like - but as the enemy you're not going to worry about them unless you know Big Mama (two of them, bristling with 5th Gen warfare capability!) will come and back them up if necessary.
Auxtank is offline