PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Why was 737NG developed?
View Single Post
Old 25th Dec 2019, 22:54
  #41 (permalink)  
tdracer
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,420
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by Fat Dog
I agree. I have plenty of time in both and from a pilots POV the -700 is miles better. Frankly the -800 is a bit of a dog.
Not sure I understand the 'a bit of a dog' comment. IF your operator selected the max available rating for the model, the -800 has a slightly better thrust/weight ratio than the -700 (the max thrust is limited on the -700 due to the ability of the tail to counteract the thrust induced pitch-up - it's also limited on the -800 for the same reason, but not as much due to the longer fuselage). However a lower thrust rating means lower costs to the operator, so some operators will select a lower thrust rating than what's available.
That's not the fault of the aircraft or the engine - blame the bean counters at your operator.
tdracer is offline