PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - MAX’s Return Delayed by FAA Reevaluation of 737 Safety Procedures
Old 16th Dec 2019, 22:12
  #4569 (permalink)  
edmundronald
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Paris
Age: 74
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GordonR_Cape
Short answer: The autopilot and MCAS are different sub-systems running on each FCC.

The autopilot is a 3-axis system, and demands high integrity data from muliple sensors to operate safely.

MCAS is a subroutine of the speed-trim system, and both operate on a single axis of pitch via the horizontal stabiliser.

IMO this is where things went wrong. Speed trim is a closed-loop system, with limited authority in pitch, and failure is not catastrophic. MCAS was supposed to be closed-loop, but due to AOA failure it became open-loop. It also had larger authority, and unlimited scope.

Thus a safe and trusted sub-system became a monster, due to a combination of hardware error, faulty design, and lack of foresight.
Speaking as an engineer SLF, the number of bad design decisions and implementation errors impinging on this subsystem are amazing: To the actual repeat/cyclic MCAS with lethal authority, add

- single AoA use in MCAS
- AoA disagree light inoperative
- column override switch mods
- missing/removed MCAS documentation
- simulators with no clutches on trim wheels to feedback extreme trim force

I can only imagine that the engineering team was dysfunctional with respect to safety checks.

Edmund
edmundronald is offline